Posts Tagged ‘financial clients’

Henry Ford would have made a great financial planner—take a lesson

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

Eighty years ago Henry Ford uncovered the efficiency of product standardization and the assembly line. The product was so standardized it gave rise to the joke that a customer could have a car in any color—so long as it was black. Even though this winning formula for efficiency and profitability is decades old, most financial advisers ignore it and have organized their businesses inefficiently.

Many financial advisers treat each individual financial client as a custom, individualized project. Unless you have financial clients that will pay you a lot (i.e. you earn at least $15,000 annually per client), you will never have a good business with this approach.

Your business must be set up as a process. Every new financial client gets the same services and products. Sure, they may get them in different proportions, but every client who gets the “moderate portfolio” had better own the same stocks or funds or you are setting yourself up by spending excessive time on each account, providing personalized service when it’s not necessary and you’re not being paid enough to do so. You do it because you are desperate to gain and retain financial clients as you have an inadequate marketing system.

A really good business is a cookie cutter approach to dealing with clients. That does not mean clients get some impersonal program. It means they get a great program because you have honed the creation of your services and products that you offer to the exact needs of the finely focused homogeneous market you service. If you cannot treat each client in a similar fashion, then you have not adequately focused your target market and you will forever be spending 12-hour days at the office.

Does Intel design a new chip for each customer? No, they do not do projects. Their business is a process, producing millions of the same chips per month.

Should every business be designed as a process? No. Estate planning does not often lend itself to a process and each client may need an individualized program. Just make sure that when you work on a project basis like this, you get paid a lot.

Let’s take examples to make this clear. Do you think attorneys charge a lot? They must because it’s difficult to make a process out of the work they do. Each client is a separate consulting project with new research and investigation required. But notice that family doctors set themselves up as a process. The doctor offers a very narrow set of products and services.

He can advise on these issues:
Joint pain
Soft tissue maladies
Head ache
Cold and flu

He uses the same prescription drug whenever he sees the same situation (i.e. he recommends the Merck drug for joint pain every time, rather than what many financial planners do—recommend the ABC growth fund one month and the XYZ growth fund next month). If a doctor is confronted with a need outside of the narrow products and services he offers, he sends you to the specialist.

Each patient gets 20 minutes:

· 4 minutes asking questions
· 8 minutes observation of patient
· 8 minutes to administer a treatment, prescribe a drug or refer to a specialist

NEXT PATIENT, NURSE!

Family physicians are the ultimate example of professional efficiency.

Once you define your target market, let’s take retirees for example, you select the products that are appropriate for people who are retired: fixed income investments, conservative equities, health insurance products. And while each client is an individual with individual circumstances, they all have a need for some degree of these products.

Of course, Mr. Smith may get 100% fixed income products with the funds he brings you because he has a large net worth and no need to tolerate equity volatility nor does he need equity growth. He has adequate health insurance and no need for long term care insurance. Mrs. Jones, with a more modest portfolio, gets a portfolio of 60% fixed income, 40% equities and she also needs more affordable health insurance and a long term care policy. While each financial client is different, they all get the same building blocks in different proportions.

Through this standardization of clients and the products and services you provide, you get very efficient. Assistants can handle much of the grunt work and you get to leave the office at 3 pm for golf.

Take a lesson from Henry Ford. For efficiency and profit, standardize what you offer.

Post provided by Javelin Marketing

Share This Post

How to Replicate Your Easiest and Most Lucrative Sales

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

Professionals in financial services often make the sales part harder than it need be. I have seen the following occurrence many times. You may recognize it:

A financial advisor tries a new system of generating business. Everything works well and they capture a few easy and profitable sales. The financial advisor thinks that he has found the holy grail so he does more of the same, but soon the results stop coming. So he abandons that holy grail and moves on in search of the next holy grail. Such financial advisors move from product to product, system to system, broker dealer to broker dealer, etc. They are always looking for the one activity that will turn them into a top producer.

This model of searching for the next greatest thing is the road to permanently low production or inconsistent flash-in-the–pan results.

Take a lesson from marriage relationships. If you want a marriage that works, you make a commitment and you stick with it. You work out the kinks, get professional counseling if you need it, do some soul searching but you commit to making the marriage work. You do not change spouses every year or two like you do your business activity. If you treated your business with the same commitment, you’d be rich and retired by now.

You say you’ll get committed as soon as you find a system that’s worth getting committed to? You’ve got it backwards. The system that works is the one you commit to.

Let’s say you start doing financial seminars. The attendance is great at first and you open a lot of new accounts and gather new financial clients. But then the attendance starts falling, appointments drop off and it’s costing you the same amount to hold the financial seminars for reduced results. Right at this point when you are ready to chuck the system, stop!

There is nothing wrong with the system! Rather, there are variables affecting your results that you do not yet understand or identify. Your job at this point is not to chuck the system and start your searching, but to dig in your heals and commit to finding the key variables which cause the best results.

I think there’s “simplistic thinking disease” we catch from being in the financial services business. The “gurus” reduce everything to a few simplistic variables such as rising interest rates, a falling dollar or the employment report. So we begin thinking that there are only a few variables that matter with any financial services marketing system that we select for generating business. We get the “simplistic thinking disease” and stop trying to figure out what causes our results.We adopt this simplistic thinking when in reality, there are thousands of variables that affect the market. Similarly, there can be thousands of variables that can affect any business approach you take. The key is to find the “key success factors” and control these to maximize your outcomes.

With seminars, you can experiment with several factors:

  • Change the day
  • Change the time of day
  • Change the location
  • Invite people from different zip codes or with different demographic criteria
  • Change the seminar title
  • Add a picture to your invitation
  • Remove the return address from the envelope

There are dozens of factors you could change. Use your intuition and your gut to select the key factors you should change first and make only one change. You can only carry on a scientific experiment and measure the results of changing a factor if you change one factor at a time. This is the type of tenacious research that had Edison invent the light bulb or is responsible for almost any drug you can buy. Trial and error based on educated guesses. Those who are most committed get the extraordinary results.

The process is never done. I know top producers that have done seminars for 20 years, and these top producers are still experimenting. These seminars have been very profitable during and those most committed know they can always achieve better results.

I once had a teacher who told me, “Don’t expect to get heat from the fireplace until you put the wood in.” Great results follow from committed action, not from a continual search for the next idea you hope works better. Identify the last approach you employed that initially gave good results and then you stopped using the system. Return to it, commit to it and master it.

Share This Post